New Posts / Social Issues

Tampon Tax and Osborne: So frustrated I had to come up with a new word


From my Huffington Post blog. 

It’s taken me a while to digest George Osborne’s announcement in the Autumn Statement. The government decided to put the £15m tax raised from putting VAT on tampons and sanitary products towards funding women’s shelters and refuges. Groups like Sisters Uncut have been campaigning heavily and quite rightly for better funding in this area. This amount of money, going to this place, is undoubtedly a good thing.

But I’m left uneasy. The tampon tax, tied up in enormous amounts of EU red tape, was never going to be a quick win. It’s a battle fought for many years but one that large numbers of the general public have only recently got behind, 300,000 of us in fact. The announcement in the Commons was met by the Tory front bench with back slapping and broad grins but as Labour MP Jess Phillips reportedly shouted, “You’re not paying it, George, I am.” I cannot argue against the funding for these services as it is desperately needed. But this should have already been there. We as women, should not be bearing the burden of supplying the money for these services. We all should be. It feels like a bribe – it feels silencing – but because of the magnitude of the gesture, it makes me feel guilty even saying that.

Feeling frustrated and lost for words, I decided to make up a new one. Credrupt. Definition: to take the very thing that has given you a bad reputation and use it against itself. This, I think, sums the situation up. If you have lost your credibility in relation to a certain issue then you are morally bankrupt. Therefore credrupt. The public has lost faith in you in this area, meaning you need to offset your empathy deficit. The only way to do this is to make a gesture or donation to an area that is in no doubt need of help. The absurdity of the tampon tax makes it an extremely popular campaign. 50% of the country paying a tax on products that are essential for their everyday lives isn’t really something that can really be opposed in modern Britain. The government’s ability to ignore the situation until recently and their powerlessness to sway European law on this issue leaves their credibility in terms of women’s rights pretty low.

Mulling this over I began to realise this isn’t the first time I’ve felt this particular brand of frustration. Last year during the height of calls to end Page 3 The Sun pulled a similar stunt. They were under huge pressure to end page 3. In an attempt to rid themselves of their moral deficit they started the “Check ‘em Tuesday” campaign. Both the reach and value of this campaign is undeniable to campaigners like me.  The biggest selling newspaper in our country decided to devote front pages to spread awareness about breast cancer. I was left gob smacked. They launched the campaign with sexualised images of women whilst encouraging women to check for signs of the deadly disease. It was a credrupt gesture to try and disarm the equality campaigners calling for the end of misogynistic pictures in a daily newspaper.

When you start to look for these sorts of gestures you start to realise they are all around us. Take McDonald’s sponsoring the Olympics. The money they put into the games and into charitable sports organisations means that opposition feels powerless to challenge the extremely unhealthy and addictive food they sell. We all know McDonald’s is bad for us and that obesity is one of the greatest public health risks facing our world today but the corporation continues to force itself into our consciousness with aggressive advertising at events like the Olympics.

The reason that these credrupt gestures are so silencing is for three reasons: love, money and power. It is PR at a level that everyday people can’t even comprehend. Our love and concern for each other as a society will mean we will always be grateful if something or someone is being helped that needs it. The fear that you could harm something vulnerable by speaking up is the most powerful silencing tool that there will ever be. Money and power create a system of capitalism leaving us subservient. We cannot fathom 15 million pounds because it is much more than most of us will make in our whole lifetime. It seems impossible. The people who sit in Westminster have the power to make real tangible change in our lives. Like whether we have access to services that care for our families when sick or access to education and social mobility. Papers like The Sun, owned by huge corporations, have the power to put a megaphone onto any subject capturing the attention of our whole country.  It can change lives and their potential to do this for the better keeps us captivated.

In naming credrupt gestures I’m not interested in taking away from the good deeds that are done, even if myself or others see it as a bribe of sorts. But if you want to restore your moral deficit you must take an interest in morals, not just gestures. If you feel like you need to back a good cause or put some money into something to regain credibility please do that – brilliant, thank you – but then have a think about, and take action to fix, the wrongs that meant you lost your credibility in the first place.

One thought on “Tampon Tax and Osborne: So frustrated I had to come up with a new word

  1. > I cannot argue against the funding for these services as it is desperately needed.

    There are virtually no tax/ charity funded shelters, helplines, or other services available for male victims of rape, domestic abuse, violence etc despite the fact that men account for half the victims.

    Not long ago a man who devoted his life to providing a single shelter for men committed suicide after he eventually lost his never ending battle to secure funds for it and it was forced to close.

    Do you believe male victims and female victims deserve equal treatment and equal levels of care and sympathy …. as per ‘gender equality’?

    > But this should have already been there. We as women, should not be bearing the burden of supplying the money for these services.

    While women literally buy their own tampons, women tend to be financially supported by men to a greater or lesser degree. Single women either support themselves or get partial or total support from the state. And married and cohabiting women generally contribute between 50% – 0% of the household income.

    Women who a prepared to contribute more than 50% to a household or relationship are still a pretty rare breed.

    The bottom line is more of men’s earnings ends up in women’s pockets (or paying for women’s services) than women’s money ends up in men’s pockets (or paying for men’s services).

    Therefore , if none of men’s taxed earnings went towards female-specific services, and none of women’s taxed earnings went towards male-specific services then women would be far, far worse off.

    Not only are there virtually no services for male victims of rape/ domestic abuse/ violence but men also pay a disproportionate amount towards women’s services. And men’s extra financial burden is reflected in the greater average number of hours men work, and the more dangerous, unpleasant and unhealthy jobs men opt for – in order to get that extra income they need to support themselves and the women in their lives (and in wider society).

    As a result men have shorter life expectancy and 20 times higher rates of death at work than women.

    As with most things in this ‘he for she’ society, if we ever do achieve true gender equality it will mean a lowering of living standards for women, and a raising of living standards for men.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s